Fallout from Supreme Court decision — NON-Christians "need not apply"

Whenever you hear cries that freedom has won, it’s worth contemplating who, if anyone, has lost.
Sometimes it takes a while for the implications of a US Supreme Court decision to be known. Not so in the case of the recent one allowing prayer before commencing government business.  As this article on the Slate website indicates, LESS than 24 HOURS passed between the ruling and a government official saying

that he would seek to impose a Christian-only prayer policy.

“The freedom of religion doesn’t mean that every religion has to be heard,” said Bedrosian on Monday night, adding that he is concerned about groups such as Wiccans and Satanists. “If we allow everything … where do you draw the line?” he asked.

Indeed. Asked if he would allow representatives from non-Christian faiths and non-faiths, including Jews, Muslims, atheists, and others, Bedrosian candidly replied that he likely would not.”

 Bedrosian evidently wrote a letter to the Roanoke Times in 2007 making this same point. There he argued that only Christians should enjoy freedom of religion in America, and that “one of the greatest moments in U.S. Senate history came when a Christian group recently shouted for God to forgive us during the opening prayer of a Hindu in the Senate.”

A few days later, he reiterated his position, but took it even farther this time. Stating (see here) that having to hear non-Christian invocations violated HIS rights “because I don’t believe that”. Bedrosian has described Freedom of Religion as a “hoax” in the past claiming that

 “the global warming crowd worships the environment as god, the abortionist has the death of unborn babies as their god, and the homosexuals have sexual freedom as their god.”

“The real battle is keeping the name of Jesus as Lord,” Bedrosian wrote in 2007. “The name Jesus is what makes us a Christian people and a Christian nation. This is why we must continue our heritage as a Christian nation and remove all other gods.”

That’s what Bedrosian intends to do in his position as county supervisor, saying he would reject any request by any non-Christian adherent to deliver a religious or secular invocation.

“I would say no,” Bedrosian said. “That does not infringe on their freedom of religion. The truth is you’re trying to infringe on my right, because I don’t believe that.”

Well, Mr. Bedrosian, I don’t believe in YOUR religion — which is MY right — and this DOES infringe on my freedom of religion because you are trying to define Christianity (and your own ‘flavor’ of it at that) as the “official” religion of the country I live in. I take exception to that……. 

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s